MakerDAO, the governance token behind the fourth largest stablecoin by market capitalization DAI, has decreased in trading volume by 37% and seen a 3.7% dip in token price over the last 24 hours. (Source: Coin Market Cap) The move follows significant changes proposed to Maker’s governance structure. Following the Tornado Cash sanctions last year, Rune […]
MakerDAO, the governance token behind the fourth largest stablecoin by market capitalization DAI, has decreased in trading volume by 37% and seen a 3.7% dip in token price over the last 24 hours.
The move follows significant changes proposed to Maker’s governance structure.
Following the Tornado Cash sanctions last year, Rune Christensen, the co-founder of MakerDAO, warned of a similar fate for the decentralized stablecoin platform.
In Christensen’s view, government authorities were bound to target MakerDAO sooner or later. A move that prompted the introduction of the Endgame plan to enhance censorship resistance.
Maker’s Endgame proposal aims to strengthen its decentralized finance (DeFi) platform operating on the Ethereum blockchain allowing users can create and trade stablecoins backed by collateral in cryptocurrencies with the governance of the platform and its stability maintained by the native token (MKR).
MakerDAO unveils Endgame tokenomics
The new system proposes the division of the DAO into smaller units known as MetaDAOs, each with distinct tokens and objectives, while limiting centralized assets backing DAI to 25% and introducing negative interest rates to reduce liquidation risks.
Criticism of Maker’s plan
However, critics of the plan worry that it creates a potential algorithmic death spiral for DAI similar to what happened during the Terra/Luna UST collapse.
Hmm looks a lot like backing $UST with its governance token $LUNA.
Did @stablekwon secretly infiltrate @MakerDAO? https://t.co/3u6NzOMkPK
— Arthur Hayes (@CryptoHayes) February 24, 2023
MakerDAO’s Endgame Tokenomics draws comparisons to Terra’s Seigniorage Mechanism
Similar to MakerDAO’s Endgame Tokenomics, the Terra platform has employed a seigniorage mechanism to stabilize its stablecoins’ prices. This involves generating and destroying tokens in response to market demand, with new tokens created when the stablecoin’s value drops and removed when it rises.
Critics however were quick to label this mechanism a potential liquidity exit scam, enabling users to leave the ecosystem through DAI without selling their MKR tokens while retaining influence over the protocol’s governance.
Vitalik Buterin chimes in
Vitalik Buterin, the creator of Ethereum, has previously expressed concerns about the potential expansion of the DAI protocol’s attack surface as more types of collateral are accepted. The amount of DAI generated in relation to centralized stablecoins, such as USDC, currently represents 56% of all DAI. Additionally, real-world assets, such as property loans, which are not visible on-chain, currently represent 9.6% of all DAI.
The centralization of decentralized governance
Just one single MKR wallet holds 12% of all governance tokens, and two unknown wallets have a total 44% of the voting power. A dynamic that some speculate has led to Gary Gensler, the chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission, declaring any crypto other than Bitcoin as a security.
Others downplay risks based on market cap disparity
The above highlights the challenges and risks of keeping a stablecoin peg, particularly in volatile market conditions.
However, despite concerns raised, the CEO and creator of Frax Finance, Sam Kazemian, stated that he is excited to see the results of MakerDAO’s exit plan.
“The MakerDAO community is too conservative for their own good. This would be a game-changer for the protocol and allow them to stay ahead of the curve. People are forgetting that DAI isn’t backed by the USD anymore anyway, so why not make it as efficient as possible?”
The post MakerDAO’s governance token sees a 37% decrease in 24H trading volume appeared first on CryptoSlate.